OSRM vs Protomaps

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOSRMProtomaps
CategoryMaps & GISMaps & GIS
LicenseBSD-2-ClauseBSD-3-Clause
LanguageC++TypeScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM8,192 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbinary, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 7,955★ 2,980
First released20122021
ReplacesGoogle Directions APIMapbox, Google Maps

Why pick each one

Choose OSRM if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 8k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
OSRM details

Choose Protomaps if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Active community (3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Protomaps details

Frequently asked questions

Is OSRM or Protomaps better?

Neither is universally better. OSRM has the larger community, while Protomaps is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are OSRM and Protomaps free and open-source?

Yes. OSRM is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and Protomaps under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run OSRM and Protomaps with Docker?

OSRM: yes. Protomaps: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons