OroCRM vs FluentCRM Self-Hosted
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted crm & business apps options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OroCRM
Open-source CRM for B2B sales teams
VS
FluentCRM Self-Hosted
Open-source CRM and contact pipeline manager
| Feature | OroCRM | FluentCRM Self-Hosted |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CRM & Business Apps | CRM & Business Apps |
| License | OSL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 681 | ★ 1,192 |
| First released | 2014 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Salesforce, HubSpot | HubSpot, Pipedrive |
Why pick each one
Choose OroCRM if…
- Released under the OSL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
Choose FluentCRM Self-Hosted if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is OroCRM or FluentCRM Self-Hosted better?
FluentCRM Self-Hosted is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider OroCRM if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are OroCRM and FluentCRM Self-Hosted free and open-source?
Yes. OroCRM is licensed under OSL-3.0 and FluentCRM Self-Hosted under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OroCRM and FluentCRM Self-Hosted with Docker?
OroCRM: yes. FluentCRM Self-Hosted: yes.