OroCRM vs Rukovoditel

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOroCRMRukovoditel
CategoryCRM & Business AppsProject Management & Tasks
LicenseOSL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguagePHPPHP
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcebare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 681★ 29
First released20142012
ReplacesSalesforce, HubSpotJira, Salesforce

Why pick each one

Choose OroCRM if…

  • Released under the OSL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in PHP
OroCRM details

Choose Rukovoditel if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Written in PHP
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Rukovoditel details

Frequently asked questions

Is OroCRM or Rukovoditel better?

Neither is universally better. OroCRM has the larger community, while Rukovoditel is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are OroCRM and Rukovoditel free and open-source?

Yes. OroCRM is licensed under OSL-3.0 and Rukovoditel under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run OroCRM and Rukovoditel with Docker?

OroCRM: yes. Rukovoditel: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons