Orama vs Quickwit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Orama
Fast full-text and vector search engine for any runtime
VS
Quickwit
Cloud-native search engine for logs and traces
| Feature | Orama | Quickwit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | source, binary | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,519 | ★ 11,471 |
| First released | 2022 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Algolia, Elasticsearch | Splunk, Elasticsearch |
Why pick each one
Choose Orama if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 10.5k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Orama or Quickwit better?
Neither is universally better. Quickwit has the larger community, while Orama is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Orama and Quickwit free and open-source?
Yes. Orama is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Quickwit under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Orama and Quickwit with Docker?
Orama: check the project docs for container support. Quickwit: yes.