OpenStreetMap Website vs Valhalla
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OpenStreetMap Website
The Rails application powering openstreetmap.org
VS
Valhalla
Open-source routing engine with multimodal support
| Feature | OpenStreetMap Website | Valhalla |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 8,192 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,796 | ★ 6,050 |
| First released | 2006 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Google Maps | Google Directions API |
Why pick each one
Choose OpenStreetMap Website if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Ruby
Choose Valhalla if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 6k GitHub stars
- Written in C++
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenStreetMap Website or Valhalla better?
Neither is universally better. Valhalla has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are OpenStreetMap Website and Valhalla free and open-source?
Yes. OpenStreetMap Website is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Valhalla under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenStreetMap Website and Valhalla with Docker?
OpenStreetMap Website: yes. Valhalla: yes.