AdventureLog vs OpenStreetMap Website
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
AdventureLog
Travel tracker and trip planner
VS
OpenStreetMap Website
The Rails application powering openstreetmap.org
| Feature | AdventureLog | OpenStreetMap Website |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Svelte | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,465 | ★ 2,796 |
| First released | 2026 | 2006 |
| Replaces | — | Google Maps |
Why pick each one
Choose AdventureLog if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in Svelte
Choose OpenStreetMap Website if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Ruby
Frequently asked questions
Is AdventureLog or OpenStreetMap Website better?
AdventureLog is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider OpenStreetMap Website if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are AdventureLog and OpenStreetMap Website free and open-source?
Yes. AdventureLog is licensed under GPL-3.0 and OpenStreetMap Website under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run AdventureLog and OpenStreetMap Website with Docker?
AdventureLog: yes. OpenStreetMap Website: yes.