OpenStatus vs Uptime Kuma
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Uptime Kuma
Easy self-hosted uptime monitoring tool
| Feature | OpenStatus | Uptime Kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | ≈5-minute setup |
| Health score | 91 · Excellent | 100 · Excellent |
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,143 | ★ 91,752 |
| First released | 2023 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Pingdom, Checkly | Pingdom, UptimeRobot |
What are OpenStatus and Uptime Kuma?
OpenStatus
OpenStatus is an open-source synthetic monitoring and status page platform built in TypeScript. It runs latency checks against APIs and websites from multiple regions and publishes uptime and incidents to a public status page.
- Synthetic latency monitoring
- Public status pages
- Multi-region checks
- Incident tracking
Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a self-hosted monitoring tool that checks the availability of websites, services, and APIs with a clean dashboard. It targets users who want a simple, attractive status monitor. It is deployed via Docker as a single container.
- Monitors HTTP, TCP, DNS and more
- Beautiful dashboard and status pages
- 90+ notification integrations
- Single-container deployment
OpenStatus vs Uptime Kuma: key differences
OpenStatus is written in TypeScript, while Uptime Kuma is built with JavaScript. Licensing differs — AGPL-3.0 for OpenStatus versus MIT for Uptime Kuma. Uptime Kuma is the more established project (first released 2021), while OpenStatus arrived in 2023. Uptime Kuma has the considerably larger community, at 91,752 GitHub stars versus 9,143.
Why pick each one
Choose OpenStatus if…
- Modern developer-focused UX
- Latency-aware monitoring
Watch out for
- Self-host setup is involved
- Younger project
Choose Uptime Kuma if…
- Very easy to use
- Great notifications
- Lightweight
Watch out for
- Single instance, no clustering
- Not for deep metrics
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenStatus or Uptime Kuma better?
Uptime Kuma is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider OpenStatus if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are OpenStatus and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?
Yes. OpenStatus is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenStatus and Uptime Kuma with Docker?
OpenStatus: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.