OpenSearch vs Quickwit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OpenSearch
Search and observability suite with logs and dashboards
VS
Quickwit
Cloud-native search engine for logs and traces
| Feature | OpenSearch | Quickwit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Search Engines |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Java | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,480 | ★ 11,471 |
| First released | 2021 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Elasticsearch, Splunk | Splunk, Elasticsearch |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenSearch or Quickwit better?
Neither is universally better. OpenSearch has the larger community, while Quickwit is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are OpenSearch and Quickwit free and open-source?
Yes. OpenSearch is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Quickwit under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenSearch and Quickwit with Docker?
OpenSearch: yes. Quickwit: yes.