OpenReplay vs PostHog
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OpenReplay
Self-hosted session replay and product analytics
VS
PostHog
Open-source product analytics platform
| Feature | OpenReplay | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 12,458 | ★ 37,548 |
| First released | 2021 | 2020 |
| Replaces | FullStory, LogRocket | Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Amplitude |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenReplay or PostHog better?
Neither is universally better. PostHog has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are OpenReplay and PostHog free and open-source?
Yes. OpenReplay is licensed under Apache-2.0 and PostHog under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenReplay and PostHog with Docker?
OpenReplay: yes. PostHog: yes.