Evidence vs OpenReplay
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Evidence
Code-driven business intelligence with Markdown
VS
OpenReplay
Self-hosted session replay and product analytics
| Feature | Evidence | OpenReplay |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,833 | ★ 12,458 |
| First released | 2021 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Tableau, Looker | FullStory, LogRocket |
Why pick each one
Choose Evidence if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 6.8k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Evidence or OpenReplay better?
Neither is universally better. OpenReplay has the larger community, while Evidence is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Evidence and OpenReplay free and open-source?
Yes. Evidence is licensed under MIT and OpenReplay under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Evidence and OpenReplay with Docker?
Evidence: yes. OpenReplay: yes.