OpenRCT2 vs Pterodactyl

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOpenRCT2Pterodactyl
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageC++PHP
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binary, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 16,049★ 9,115
First released20142015
ReplacesRollerCoaster TycoonTCAdmin, Multicraft

Why pick each one

Choose OpenRCT2 if…

  • Faithful modern remake
  • Active community
OpenRCT2 details

Choose Pterodactyl if…

  • Secure container isolation
  • Huge supported game library
Pterodactyl details

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenRCT2 or Pterodactyl better?

OpenRCT2 is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Pterodactyl if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are OpenRCT2 and Pterodactyl free and open-source?

Yes. OpenRCT2 is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Pterodactyl under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run OpenRCT2 and Pterodactyl with Docker?

OpenRCT2: check the project docs for container support. Pterodactyl: yes.

Related comparisons