OpenObserve vs Apache SkyWalking

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOpenObserveApache SkyWalking
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptJava
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM1,024 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 20,592★ 24,915
First released20232015
ReplacesDatadog, ElasticsearchNew Relic, Datadog

Why pick each one

Choose OpenObserve if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 20.6k GitHub stars
OpenObserve details

Choose Apache SkyWalking if…

  • Full observability suite
  • Strong Apache governance
Apache SkyWalking details

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenObserve or Apache SkyWalking better?

Neither is universally better. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community, while OpenObserve is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are OpenObserve and Apache SkyWalking free and open-source?

Yes. OpenObserve is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Apache SkyWalking under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run OpenObserve and Apache SkyWalking with Docker?

OpenObserve: yes. Apache SkyWalking: yes.

Related comparisons