Penpot vs OpenObserve

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePenpotOpenObserve
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseMPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageClojureTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetesdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 58,249★ 20,592
First released20202023
ReplacesFigmaDatadog, Elasticsearch

Why pick each one

Choose Penpot if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 58.2k GitHub stars
Penpot details

Choose OpenObserve if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 20.6k GitHub stars
OpenObserve details

Frequently asked questions

Is Penpot or OpenObserve better?

Neither is universally better. Penpot has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Penpot and OpenObserve free and open-source?

Yes. Penpot is licensed under MPL-2.0 and OpenObserve under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Penpot and OpenObserve with Docker?

Penpot: yes. OpenObserve: yes.

Related comparisons