ATAC vs Penpot

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureATACPenpot
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseMITMPL-2.0
LanguageRustClojure
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 3,689★ 58,249
First released20242020
ReplacesPostman, InsomniaFigma

Why pick each one

Choose ATAC if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (3.7k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Rust
ATAC details

Choose Penpot if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 58.2k GitHub stars
Penpot details

Frequently asked questions

Is ATAC or Penpot better?

Neither is universally better. Penpot has the larger community, while ATAC is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are ATAC and Penpot free and open-source?

Yes. ATAC is licensed under MIT and Penpot under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ATAC and Penpot with Docker?

ATAC: check the project docs for container support. Penpot: yes.

Related comparisons