Penpot vs Hurl

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePenpotHurl
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseMPL-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageClojureRust
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM2,048 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetesbinary, source
GitHub stars★ 58,249★ 19,131
First released20202020
ReplacesFigmaPostman, Insomnia

Why pick each one

Choose Penpot if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 58.2k GitHub stars
Penpot details

Choose Hurl if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 19.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Rust
Hurl details

Frequently asked questions

Is Penpot or Hurl better?

Neither is universally better. Penpot has the larger community, while Hurl is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Penpot and Hurl free and open-source?

Yes. Penpot is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Hurl under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Penpot and Hurl with Docker?

Penpot: yes. Hurl: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons