Open Library vs Yamtrack
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Open Library
Open, editable catalog and library platform for books
VS
Yamtrack
Media tracker for movies, TV shows, anime, manga, games, books and
| Feature | Open Library | Yamtrack |
|---|---|---|
| Category | E-books & Media Library | Media Servers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0-or-later |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 200 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,597 | ★ 3,306 |
| First released | 2007 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Goodreads | Goodreads, IMDB, MyAnimeList |
Why pick each one
Choose Yamtrack if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later license
- Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 200 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Open Library or Yamtrack better?
Neither is universally better. Open Library has the larger community, while Yamtrack is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Open Library and Yamtrack free and open-source?
Yes. Open Library is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Yamtrack under AGPL-3.0-or-later. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Open Library and Yamtrack with Docker?
Open Library: yes. Yamtrack: check the project docs for container support.