OpenBao vs Yopass
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OpenBao
Open-source secrets management forked from Vault
VS
Yopass
Securely share secrets with encrypted one-time links
| Feature | OpenBao | Yopass |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,961 | ★ 3,052 |
| First released | 2024 | 2016 |
| Replaces | AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault | 1Password, Doppler |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenBao or Yopass better?
Neither is universally better. OpenBao has the larger community, while Yopass is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are OpenBao and Yopass free and open-source?
Yes. OpenBao is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Yopass under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenBao and Yopass with Docker?
OpenBao: yes. Yopass: yes.