Open Web Analytics vs Umami
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Open Web Analytics
Self-hosted web analytics with click and heatmap tracking
VS
Umami
Simple, fast, privacy-focused web analytics
| Feature | Open Web Analytics | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,682 | ★ 38,103 |
| First released | 2008 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Choose Open Web Analytics if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.7k GitHub stars)
- Written in PHP
Frequently asked questions
Is Open Web Analytics or Umami better?
Umami is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Open Web Analytics if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Open Web Analytics and Umami free and open-source?
Yes. Open Web Analytics is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Umami under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Open Web Analytics and Umami with Docker?
Open Web Analytics: yes. Umami: yes.