Omeka S vs Tina CMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Omeka S
Web publication system for universities, galleries, libraries,
VS
Tina CMS
Git-backed content management with visual editing
| Feature | Omeka S | Tina CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | AGPL-3.0-only | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 75 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 504 | ★ 13,714 |
| First released | 2023 | 2021 |
| Replaces | — | Contentful, Sanity |
Why pick each one
Choose Omeka S if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-only license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 75 MB RAM
Choose Tina CMS if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 13.7k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Omeka S or Tina CMS better?
Neither is universally better. Tina CMS has the larger community, while Omeka S is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Omeka S and Tina CMS free and open-source?
Yes. Omeka S is licensed under AGPL-3.0-only and Tina CMS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Omeka S and Tina CMS with Docker?
Omeka S: check the project docs for container support. Tina CMS: yes.