SHSelfHostIndex

TimeOff Management vs FocusTime Tracker

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
TI TimeOff Management Self-hosted leave and absence tracking for companies VS FO FocusTime Tracker Minimal command-line and web work timer
FeatureTimeOff ManagementFocusTime Tracker
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseBSD-2-ClauseMIT
LanguageJavaScriptPython
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbinary, source
GitHub stars★ 1,041★ 2,535
First released20152015
ReplacesBambooHR, Vacation TrackerToggl, Harvest

Why pick each one

Choose TimeOff Management if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
TimeOff Management details

Choose FocusTime Tracker if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
FocusTime Tracker details

Frequently asked questions

Is TimeOff Management or FocusTime Tracker better?

FocusTime Tracker is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider TimeOff Management if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are TimeOff Management and FocusTime Tracker free and open-source?

Yes. TimeOff Management is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and FocusTime Tracker under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run TimeOff Management and FocusTime Tracker with Docker?

TimeOff Management: yes. FocusTime Tracker: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons