SHSelfHostIndex

TimeOff Management vs timetrace

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
TI TimeOff Management Self-hosted leave and absence tracking for companies VS TI timetrace Simple command-line time tracker for projects
FeatureTimeOff Managementtimetrace
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseBSD-2-ClauseGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbinary, source
GitHub stars★ 1,041★ 794
First released20152021
ReplacesBambooHR, Vacation TrackerClockify, Toggl

Why pick each one

Choose TimeOff Management if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
TimeOff Management details

Choose timetrace if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
timetrace details

Frequently asked questions

Is TimeOff Management or timetrace better?

Neither is universally better. TimeOff Management has the larger community, while timetrace is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are TimeOff Management and timetrace free and open-source?

Yes. TimeOff Management is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and timetrace under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run TimeOff Management and timetrace with Docker?

TimeOff Management: yes. timetrace: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons