OctoPrint vs Spacedrive

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOctoPrintSpacedrive
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicensefreeAGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonRust
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, one-clickbinary
GitHub stars★ 9,062★ 38,732
First released20222022
ReplacesGoogle Drive, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose OctoPrint if…

  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • One-click install on common self-host platforms
  • Mature project with 9.1k GitHub stars
OctoPrint details

Choose Spacedrive if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 38.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in Rust
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Spacedrive details

Frequently asked questions

Is OctoPrint or Spacedrive better?

Neither is universally better. Spacedrive has the larger community, while OctoPrint is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are OctoPrint and Spacedrive free and open-source?

Yes. OctoPrint is licensed under free and Spacedrive under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run OctoPrint and Spacedrive with Docker?

OctoPrint: yes. Spacedrive: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons