Octobox vs Tegon
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Octobox
Take back control of your GitHub Notifications
VS
Tegon
AI-first open-source issue tracking for developers
| Feature | Octobox | Tegon |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Ruby | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,478 | ★ 1,916 |
| First released | 2026 | 2024 |
| Replaces | — | Linear, Jira |
Why pick each one
Choose Octobox if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in Ruby
Choose Tegon if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Octobox or Tegon better?
Neither is universally better. Octobox has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Octobox and Tegon free and open-source?
Yes. Octobox is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Tegon under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Octobox and Tegon with Docker?
Octobox: yes. Tegon: yes.