Donetick vs Octobox
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Donetick
Shared chore and task management for households and teams
VS
Octobox
Take back control of your GitHub Notifications
| Feature | Donetick | Octobox |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,411 | ★ 4,478 |
| First released | 2024 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Todoist, Tody | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Donetick if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.4k GitHub stars)
Choose Octobox if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in Ruby
Frequently asked questions
Is Donetick or Octobox better?
Neither is universally better. Octobox has the larger community, while Donetick is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Donetick and Octobox free and open-source?
Yes. Donetick is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Octobox under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Donetick and Octobox with Docker?
Donetick: yes. Octobox: yes.