Octobox vs Tasks.md
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Octobox
Take back control of your GitHub Notifications
VS
Tasks.md
Self-hosted Markdown file-based task management board
| Feature | Octobox | Tasks.md |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,478 | ★ 2,175 |
| First released | 2026 | 2023 |
| Replaces | — | Trello |
Why pick each one
Choose Octobox if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in Ruby
Choose Tasks.md if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Octobox or Tasks.md better?
Neither is universally better. Octobox has the larger community, while Tasks.md is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Octobox and Tasks.md free and open-source?
Yes. Octobox is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Tasks.md under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Octobox and Tasks.md with Docker?
Octobox: yes. Tasks.md: yes.