OAuth2 Proxy vs Pingora
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OAuth2 Proxy
Reverse proxy that adds authentication to any web app
VS
Pingora
Rust framework to build fast, reliable network services
| Feature | OAuth2 Proxy | Pingora |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,808 | ★ 27,153 |
| First released | 2015 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Cloudflare Access | Nginx |
Why pick each one
Choose OAuth2 Proxy if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 14.8k GitHub stars
Choose Pingora if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Mature project with 27.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is OAuth2 Proxy or Pingora better?
Neither is universally better. Pingora has the larger community, while OAuth2 Proxy is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are OAuth2 Proxy and Pingora free and open-source?
Yes. OAuth2 Proxy is licensed under MIT and Pingora under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OAuth2 Proxy and Pingora with Docker?
OAuth2 Proxy: yes. Pingora: check the project docs for container support.