Anubis vs Pingora
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Anubis
Proof-of-work proxy to block AI scraper bots
VS
Pingora
Rust framework to build fast, reliable network services
| Feature | Anubis | Pingora |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 21,230 | ★ 27,153 |
| First released | 2025 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Cloudflare Bot Management | Nginx |
Why pick each one
Choose Anubis if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 21.2k GitHub stars
Choose Pingora if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Mature project with 27.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Anubis or Pingora better?
Neither is universally better. Pingora has the larger community, while Anubis is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Anubis and Pingora free and open-source?
Yes. Anubis is licensed under MIT and Pingora under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Anubis and Pingora with Docker?
Anubis: yes. Pingora: check the project docs for container support.