NPS vs Skipper
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
NPS
Lightweight proxy server for intranet penetration
VS
Skipper
HTTP router and reverse proxy for service composition
| Feature | NPS | Skipper |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | kubernetes, docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 34,157 | ★ 3,311 |
| First released | 2019 | 2016 |
| Replaces | ngrok | Nginx, Traefik |
Why pick each one
Choose NPS if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 34.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Choose Skipper if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is NPS or Skipper better?
Neither is universally better. NPS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are NPS and Skipper free and open-source?
Yes. NPS is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Skipper under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run NPS and Skipper with Docker?
NPS: yes. Skipper: yes.