NPS vs Remmina
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
NPS
Lightweight proxy server for intranet penetration
VS
Remmina
Remote access screen and file sharing
| Feature | NPS | Remmina |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | GPL-3.0 | free |
| Language | Go | |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, one-click |
| GitHub stars | ★ 34,157 | — |
| First released | 2019 | 2022 |
| Replaces | ngrok | — |
Why pick each one
Choose NPS if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 34.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Choose Remmina if…
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is NPS or Remmina better?
Neither is universally better. NPS has the larger community, while Remmina is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are NPS and Remmina free and open-source?
Yes. NPS is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Remmina under free. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run NPS and Remmina with Docker?
NPS: yes. Remmina: yes.