SHSelfHostIndex

expose vs WG-Easy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
EX expose Beautiful, fully open-source tunnel to localhost VS WG WG-Easy The easiest way to run WireGuard VPN with a web UI
FeatureexposeWG-Easy
CategoryRemote Access & VPNRemote Access & VPN
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, dockerdocker
GitHub stars★ 4,567★ 26,595
First released20202021
ReplacesngrokOpenVPN Access Server

Why pick each one

Choose expose if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in PHP
expose details

Choose WG-Easy if…

  • Extremely easy setup
  • Friendly UI
WG-Easy details

Frequently asked questions

Is expose or WG-Easy better?

WG-Easy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider expose if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are expose and WG-Easy free and open-source?

Yes. expose is licensed under MIT and WG-Easy under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run expose and WG-Easy with Docker?

expose: yes. WG-Easy: yes.

Related comparisons