SHSelfHostIndex

Nginx Proxy Manager vs UUSEC WAF

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
NG Nginx Proxy Manager Easy reverse proxy management with a web UI and free SSL VS UU UUSEC WAF Industry-leading high-performance, AI and semantic technology web
FeatureNginx Proxy ManagerUUSEC WAF
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptShell
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker
GitHub stars★ 33,804★ 1,699
First released20192026
ReplacesCloudflare—

Why pick each one

Choose Nginx Proxy Manager if…

  • Beginner-friendly
  • Free certificates built in
Nginx Proxy Manager details

Choose UUSEC WAF if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.7k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Shell
UUSEC WAF details

Frequently asked questions

Is Nginx Proxy Manager or UUSEC WAF better?

Nginx Proxy Manager is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider UUSEC WAF if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Nginx Proxy Manager and UUSEC WAF free and open-source?

Yes. Nginx Proxy Manager is licensed under MIT and UUSEC WAF under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Nginx Proxy Manager and UUSEC WAF with Docker?

Nginx Proxy Manager: yes. UUSEC WAF: yes.

Related comparisons