AdGuard Home vs UUSEC WAF
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
AdGuard Home
Network-wide DNS ad and tracker blocker
VS
UUSEC WAF
Industry-leading high-performance, AI and semantic technology web
| Feature | AdGuard Home | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 35,977 | ★ 1,699 |
| First released | 2018 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Pi-hole, NextDNS | — |
Why pick each one
Choose AdGuard Home if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 36k GitHub stars
Choose UUSEC WAF if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.7k GitHub stars)
- Written in Shell
Frequently asked questions
Is AdGuard Home or UUSEC WAF better?
AdGuard Home is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider UUSEC WAF if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are AdGuard Home and UUSEC WAF free and open-source?
Yes. AdGuard Home is licensed under GPL-3.0 and UUSEC WAF under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run AdGuard Home and UUSEC WAF with Docker?
AdGuard Home: yes. UUSEC WAF: yes.