NGINX Prometheus Exporter vs Apache SkyWalking
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
NGINX Prometheus Exporter
Official Prometheus exporter for NGINX and NGINX Plus
VS
Apache SkyWalking
APM and observability for cloud-native architectures
| Feature | NGINX Prometheus Exporter | Apache SkyWalking |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, kubernetes | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,008 | ★ 24,915 |
| First released | 2018 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Datadog NGINX, New Relic NGINX | New Relic, Datadog |
Why pick each one
Choose NGINX Prometheus Exporter if…
- Maintained by NGINX team
- Trivial to deploy
Choose Apache SkyWalking if…
- Full observability suite
- Strong Apache governance
Frequently asked questions
Is NGINX Prometheus Exporter or Apache SkyWalking better?
Neither is universally better. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community, while NGINX Prometheus Exporter is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are NGINX Prometheus Exporter and Apache SkyWalking free and open-source?
Yes. NGINX Prometheus Exporter is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Apache SkyWalking under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run NGINX Prometheus Exporter and Apache SkyWalking with Docker?
NGINX Prometheus Exporter: yes. Apache SkyWalking: yes.
Related comparisons
- NGINX Prometheus Exporter vs Beszel
- Apache SkyWalking vs Beszel
- NGINX Prometheus Exporter vs Glances
- Apache SkyWalking vs Glances
- NGINX Prometheus Exporter vs Grafana
- Apache SkyWalking vs Grafana
- NGINX Prometheus Exporter vs Grafana k6
- Apache SkyWalking vs Grafana k6
- NGINX Prometheus Exporter vs InfluxDB
- Apache SkyWalking vs InfluxDB