Nextcloud vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNextcloudSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguagePHPGo
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, snapdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 36,362★ 33,952
First released20162015
ReplacesDropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft 365Amazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Nextcloud if…

  • Feature-rich and extensible
  • Active development and large community
  • Integrates calendar, contacts and office
Nextcloud details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Nextcloud or SeaweedFS better?

Nextcloud is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider SeaweedFS if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Nextcloud and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Nextcloud is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Nextcloud and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Nextcloud: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons