MiroTalk vs Peer-calls
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
MiroTalk
Free WebRTC video conferencing and meeting rooms
VS
Peer-calls
Group peer to peer video calls for everyone
| Feature | MiroTalk | Peer-calls |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,667 | ★ 1,903 |
| First released | 2021 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Zoom, Google Meet | BigBlueButton, Skype, Zoom |
Why pick each one
Choose Peer-calls if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is MiroTalk or Peer-calls better?
Neither is universally better. MiroTalk has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are MiroTalk and Peer-calls free and open-source?
Yes. MiroTalk is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Peer-calls under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run MiroTalk and Peer-calls with Docker?
MiroTalk: yes. Peer-calls: check the project docs for container support.