MiroTalk vs Papercups

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMiroTalkPapercups
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageJavaScriptElixir
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM512 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 4,667★ 6,097
First released20212020
ReplacesZoom, Google MeetIntercom, Drift

Why pick each one

Choose MiroTalk if…

  • Quick to deploy
  • Good feature set for free
MiroTalk details

Choose Papercups if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 6.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Elixir
Papercups details

Frequently asked questions

Is MiroTalk or Papercups better?

Neither is universally better. Papercups has the larger community, while MiroTalk is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are MiroTalk and Papercups free and open-source?

Yes. MiroTalk is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Papercups under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run MiroTalk and Papercups with Docker?

MiroTalk: yes. Papercups: yes.

Related comparisons