Memories vs Photoview

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMemoriesPhotoview
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score88 · Excellent72 · Good
CategoryPhoto ManagementPhoto Management
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM1,024 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 3,843★ 6,535
First released20222019
ReplacesGoogle Photos, iCloud PhotosGoogle Photos

What are Memories and Photoview?

Memories

Memories is a photo and video management application that runs as a Nextcloud app, offering a fast timeline view of your media. It supports face recognition, maps, albums, and metadata-aware search.

  • Fast timeline view
  • Face recognition and maps
  • Albums and tagging
  • Nextcloud integration

Read the full Memories guide →

Photoview

Photoview is a simple, user-friendly photo gallery designed to work with photos stored directly on the filesystem. It targets users wanting a lightweight gallery over an existing folder structure. It is deployed via Docker.

  • Works on existing photo folders
  • Face recognition
  • Timeline and albums
  • RAW and video support

Read the full Photoview guide →

Memories vs Photoview: key differences

Memories is written in PHP, while Photoview is built with Go. Photoview is the lighter option, starting around 512 MB of RAM against 1,024 MB for Memories. Photoview is the more established project (first released 2019), while Memories arrived in 2022.

Why pick each one

Choose Memories if…

  • Leverages existing Nextcloud
  • Polished mobile experience

Watch out for

  • Requires Nextcloud
  • AI features need extra setup
Memories details

Choose Photoview if…

  • Uses your folder structure
  • Lightweight
  • Easy setup

Watch out for

  • Fewer features than Immich
  • Slower development
Photoview details

Frequently asked questions

Is Memories or Photoview better?

Photoview is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Memories if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Memories and Photoview free and open-source?

Yes. Memories is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Photoview under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Memories and Photoview with Docker?

Memories: yes. Photoview: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Memories or Photoview?

Photoview has the smaller minimum footprint at 512 MB of RAM, compared to about 1,024 MB for Memories. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons