Memories vs OwnPhotos
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Memories
Photo management app for Nextcloud with timeline and AI
VS
OwnPhotos
Self-hosted Google Photos clone with face recognition
| Feature | Memories | OwnPhotos |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Vue | Jupyter Notebook |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,816 | ★ 2,760 |
| First released | 2022 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Google Photos, iCloud Photos | Google Photos |
Why pick each one
Choose OwnPhotos if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Jupyter Notebook
Frequently asked questions
Is Memories or OwnPhotos better?
Neither is universally better. Memories has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Memories and OwnPhotos free and open-source?
Yes. Memories is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and OwnPhotos under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Memories and OwnPhotos with Docker?
Memories: yes. OwnPhotos: yes.