Cryptomator Hub vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCryptomator HubSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageJavaGo
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetesdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 78★ 33,952
First released20222015
ReplacesBoxcryptorAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Cryptomator Hub if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Written in Java
Cryptomator Hub details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Cryptomator Hub or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Cryptomator Hub is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Cryptomator Hub and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Cryptomator Hub is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Cryptomator Hub and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Cryptomator Hub: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons