File Browser vs Cryptomator Hub

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserCryptomator Hub
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoJava
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 78
First released20172022
ReplacesDropboxBoxcryptor

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose Cryptomator Hub if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Written in Java
Cryptomator Hub details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or Cryptomator Hub better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Cryptomator Hub if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and Cryptomator Hub free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Cryptomator Hub under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and Cryptomator Hub with Docker?

File Browser: yes. Cryptomator Hub: yes.

Related comparisons