Nextcloud All-in-One vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNextcloud All-in-OnePuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker
GitHub stars★ 10,238★ 43,003
First released20222026
ReplacesDropbox, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose Nextcloud All-in-One if…

  • Much simpler than manual setup
  • Backup and update built in
  • Officially supported
Nextcloud All-in-One details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Nextcloud All-in-One or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while Nextcloud All-in-One is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Nextcloud All-in-One and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. Nextcloud All-in-One is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Nextcloud All-in-One and Puter with Docker?

Nextcloud All-in-One: yes. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons