Stringer vs rss2hook
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Stringer
Anti-social, self-hosted RSS reader
VS
rss2hook
Lightweight personal RSS aggregator and reader
| Feature | Stringer | rss2hook |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,122 | ★ 39 |
| First released | 2013 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Google Reader | Zapier, IFTTT |
Why pick each one
Choose rss2hook if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Stringer or rss2hook better?
Neither is universally better. Stringer has the larger community, while rss2hook is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Stringer and rss2hook free and open-source?
Yes. Stringer is licensed under MIT and rss2hook under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Stringer and rss2hook with Docker?
Stringer: yes. rss2hook: check the project docs for container support.