Stringer vs Feed dashboard nono Reader-self
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Stringer
Anti-social, self-hosted RSS reader
VS
Feed dashboard nono Reader-self
PHP RSS aggregator with a Google Reader API
| Feature | Stringer | Feed dashboard nono Reader-self |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,122 | ★ 153 |
| First released | 2013 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Google Reader | Google Reader, Feedly |
Why pick each one
Choose Feed dashboard nono Reader-self if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
Frequently asked questions
Is Stringer or Feed dashboard nono Reader-self better?
Neither is universally better. Stringer has the larger community, while Feed dashboard nono Reader-self is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Stringer and Feed dashboard nono Reader-self free and open-source?
Yes. Stringer is licensed under MIT and Feed dashboard nono Reader-self under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Stringer and Feed dashboard nono Reader-self with Docker?
Stringer: yes. Feed dashboard nono Reader-self: yes.