Stringer vs Floccus
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Stringer
Anti-social, self-hosted RSS reader
VS
Floccus
Sync your browser bookmarks across browsers and devices
| Feature | Stringer | Floccus |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | Ruby | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,122 | ★ 8,322 |
| First released | 2013 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Google Reader | Raindrop.io, Chrome Sync |
Why pick each one
Choose Floccus if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 8.3k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Stringer or Floccus better?
Floccus is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Stringer if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Stringer and Floccus free and open-source?
Yes. Stringer is licensed under MIT and Floccus under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Stringer and Floccus with Docker?
Stringer: yes. Floccus: check the project docs for container support.