Feedbin vs Tinyfeed
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Feedbin
Nice, simple, open-source RSS reader
VS
Tinyfeed
Generate a static HTML page from a collection of feeds
| Feature | Feedbin | Tinyfeed |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | E-books & Media Library |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,768 | ★ 373 |
| First released | 2013 | 2025 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Google Reader | Feedly, Google Reader, Netvibes |
Why pick each one
Choose Feedbin if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Ruby
Choose Tinyfeed if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Feedbin or Tinyfeed better?
Neither is universally better. Feedbin has the larger community, while Tinyfeed is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Feedbin and Tinyfeed free and open-source?
Yes. Feedbin is licensed under MIT and Tinyfeed under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Feedbin and Tinyfeed with Docker?
Feedbin: yes. Tinyfeed: check the project docs for container support.