Nebula vs Termix
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Nebula
Scalable overlay networking tool from Slack
VS
Termix
Clientless web-based server management platform with SSH terminal,
| Feature | Nebula | Termix |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 17,591 | ★ 14,647 |
| First released | 2019 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Tailscale | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Nebula if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 17.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose Termix if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 14.6k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Nebula or Termix better?
Neither is universally better. Nebula has the larger community, while Termix is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Nebula and Termix free and open-source?
Yes. Nebula is licensed under MIT and Termix under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Nebula and Termix with Docker?
Nebula: check the project docs for container support. Termix: yes.