Nakama vs Pelican Panel

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNakamaPelican Panel
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoPHP
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 13,121★ 2,229
First released20172024
ReplacesPlayFab, FirebaseTCAdmin, Multicraft

Why pick each one

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Choose Pelican Panel if…

  • Easier setup than predecessors
  • Active development
Pelican Panel details

Frequently asked questions

Is Nakama or Pelican Panel better?

Neither is universally better. Nakama has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Nakama and Pelican Panel free and open-source?

Yes. Nakama is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Pelican Panel under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Nakama and Pelican Panel with Docker?

Nakama: yes. Pelican Panel: yes.

Related comparisons