LinuxGSM vs Pelican Panel
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
LinuxGSM
Command-line tool for dedicated game servers
VS
Pelican Panel
Modern open-source game server control panel
| Feature | LinuxGSM | Pelican Panel |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Game Servers | Game Servers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Shell | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,881 | ★ 2,229 |
| First released | 2012 | 2024 |
| Replaces | TCAdmin, Multicraft | TCAdmin, Multicraft |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is LinuxGSM or Pelican Panel better?
Neither is universally better. LinuxGSM has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are LinuxGSM and Pelican Panel free and open-source?
Yes. LinuxGSM is licensed under MIT and Pelican Panel under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run LinuxGSM and Pelican Panel with Docker?
LinuxGSM: check the project docs for container support. Pelican Panel: yes.
Related comparisons
- LinuxGSM vs Gameap
- Pelican Panel vs Gameap
- LinuxGSM vs papermc-docker
- Pelican Panel vs papermc-docker
- LinuxGSM vs ArchiSteamFarm
- Pelican Panel vs ArchiSteamFarm
- LinuxGSM vs Lichess
- Pelican Panel vs Lichess
- LinuxGSM vs Cytopia Note - games browser alt 2048
- Pelican Panel vs Cytopia Note - games browser alt 2048