mStream vs PeerTube

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturemStreamPeerTube
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM256 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 2,366★ 15,236
First released20162018
ReplacesSpotifyYouTube, Vimeo

Why pick each one

Choose mStream if…

  • Easy to install
  • Good mobile experience
mStream details

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Frequently asked questions

Is mStream or PeerTube better?

Neither is universally better. PeerTube has the larger community, while mStream is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are mStream and PeerTube free and open-source?

Yes. mStream is licensed under GPL-3.0 and PeerTube under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run mStream and PeerTube with Docker?

mStream: yes. PeerTube: yes.

Related comparisons