MQTTX Web vs ToolJet
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
MQTTX Web
Your All-in-One MQTT Client Toolbox
VS
ToolJet
Low-code platform for building and automating business tools
| Feature | MQTTX Web | ToolJet |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | free | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, one-click | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,012 | ★ 38,306 |
| First released | 2022 | 2021 |
| Replaces | — | Retool, Microsoft Power Apps |
Why pick each one
Choose MQTTX Web if…
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Mature project with 5k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is MQTTX Web or ToolJet better?
Neither is universally better. ToolJet has the larger community, while MQTTX Web is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are MQTTX Web and ToolJet free and open-source?
Yes. MQTTX Web is licensed under free and ToolJet under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run MQTTX Web and ToolJet with Docker?
MQTTX Web: yes. ToolJet: yes.